Sunday, June 8, 2008

Giani Iqbal can't summon Makkar, says Vedanti

Giani Iqbal can't summon Makkar, says Vedanti
02 Jun 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Pg 06

http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=02_06_2008_006_003&typ=0&pub=722
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTPunjab/Article/2008/06/02/006/02_06_2008_006_003.jpg

AKAL TAKHT Jathedar Joginder Singh Vedanti today said that Takht Sri Patna Sahib Jathedar Giani Iqbal Singh had no right to summon Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) chief Avtar Singh Makkar.

Talking to mediapersons at Gurdwara Sri Fatehgarh Sahib, Vedanti said Giani Iqbal could not summon former Akal Takht jathedar Prof Darshan Singh Ragi either.

Giani Iqbal Singh had recently summoned Makkar over the publication of a controversial book by the SGPC. Prof Ragi was summoned for his stand on the ‘Dasam Granth' and ‘Raag Mala'.

Jathedar Vedanti said decisions on Panthic issues fell in the domain of the Akal Takht as they concerned the Sikh community He said Jathedars of . various Takhts could decide issues related to their areas only, but Panthic issues could be taken up by Jathedars of the Takhts jointly at the Akal Takht Sahib.

He said Giani Iqbal had taken certain decisions on his own, which were not valid as they did not fall in his domain. Declining comment on any controversy, Vedanti said a meeting of the Sikh clergy would be held at the Akal Takht on June 6 to discuss important issues

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Indian Education Minister brands Sikhs as murderers


Times of India Nagpur Pg 10

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3060349.cms

Arjun heaps praise on Sonia, Rahul

LUCKNOW: In the backdrop of controversy over his remarks on democracy and definition of loyalty in Congress, senior party leader and HRD Minister Arjun Singh on Wednesday heaped praise on Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi saying they have filled the void created by Rajiv Gandhi's death.

"After the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, a vacuum was natural... We, however, are fortunate that this vacuum was filled by Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi," Singh said.

The Minister was speaking at a function, organised here by the Backwards Cell of Uttar Pradesh Congress, to observe the 17th death anniversary of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

The veteran Congress leader chose the occasion to pay rich tributes to Rajiv Gandhi, saying for him patriotism and the country's interests were supreme.

"Only a person who is totally committed to the nation can make an attempt like Rajiv Gandhi did to bring murderers of his mother into the mainstream", the HRD minister said.

Singh said Rajiv Gandhi always took up the cause of weaker sections of society and this resulted in increased representation of women in the Panchayti Raj system.

Referring to 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in higher education, Singh said several parties tried to make an issue out of it.

But, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the Congress chief ensured that these sections should not remain deprived of this facility, he said.

Making light of reports that Congress lacked support within the UPA on the quota issue for the backwards, Singh said the legislation received Cabinet's full support and was passed unanimously in Parliament.

Accusing some parties of indulging in caste-based politics, the Minister said creating conflicts could help them temporarily but it was not in country's interests.

The Congress never believed in pitting one caste against the other and was of the view that all sections of the society should work together for country's progress and development, he said.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Amritdhari (Baptised) Sikh creates history Elected Deputy Mayor

Amritdhari (Baptised) Sikh creates history Elected Deputy Mayor
20 May 2008 Rozanaspokesman Pg 03

http://www.rozanaspokesman.com/May/20/FRS3.jpg




Monday, May 19, 2008

Differences among Sikhs on Tankhaiya

Differences among Sikhs on Tankhaiya
19 May 2008 HindustanDainik Delhi Pg 04

http://epaper.hindustandainik.com/Web/Article/2008/05/19/004/19_05_2008_004_017.jpg


14 years on, justice eludes Punjab family

14 years on, justice eludes Punjab family
19 May 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Pg 11

http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=19_05_2008_011_010&typ=0&pub=264
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTMumbai/Article/2008/05/19/011/19_05_2008_011_010.jpg


Victim's 91-yr-old mother awaits turn to depose against cops who abducted her son BLAME IT on our criminal justice system, here is a 91-year-old woman waiting to depose against senior Punjab police of- ficers who allegedly abducted his son and son-in-law 14 years ago. The two victims - Ashok Kumar and Vinod Kumar - nev- er returned home.
"With the pace at which the trial is going I don't hope to see the verdict in my life. At least the court should expedite in recording of my testimony as a prosecution witness," said Amar Kaur, mother of Vinod Kumar, a Ludhiana-based business, who was allegedly picked up at the be hest of then Senior Superinten- dent of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to settle a personal dis- pute. Saini is now Director Vigi- lance (Punjab).

Kaur has moved an applica- tion before the court of Additional Session Judge Vinod Goyal, who has issued notices to the CBI for May 20. "My mother became a bit impatient ever since she suf- fered a stroke of paralysis last year. Her health has become un- stable since then," said Ashish Kumar, victim Vinod's younger brother. She has also written let- ters to Chief Justice seeking an early disposal of the case, which did not see any movement for 10 years until it was transferred to Delhi from a Punjab court on apex court's order.

On December 6, 2006, a the court had framed charges of criminal conspiracy and wrongful confinement, among others, against Punjab Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini, and police officers Sukhmohinder Singh Sandhu, Paramjit Singh and Balbir Chand Tiwari in the case of the 1994 abduction, illegal detention and disappearance of two Ludhiana-based businessmen and their driver. Within a few days on December 15, Saini filed a petition seeking the quash ing of the charges.

According to the prosecution, in March 1994 Vinod Kumar disappeared from the cus tody of the Ludhiana Kotwali station, along with his brother-inlaw Ashok Kumar and driver Mukhtiyar Singh, after being detained between February 23, 1994 and March 3, 1994.

The court notes that evidence gathered from the CBI's investigation suggests then-SSP Saini wanted Vinod and Ashok Kumar to implicate their family business, Saini Motors, in illegal activities. Saini was in a feud with his relatives Narender and Meenakshi Saini, owners of Saini Motors. The CBI registered the case on April 18, 1994 and filed the chargesheet in May 2000. naziya.alvi@hindustantimes.com
Hindustan Times Special

1984 riots case 5 witnesses examined: CBI

1984 riots case 5 witnesses examined: CBI

15 May 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Pg 06

http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=15_05_2008_006_003&typ=0&pub=722
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTPunjab/Article/2008/05/15/006/15_05_2008_006_003.jpg


THE CBI today claimed before a Delhi court that it had examined five witnesses and a few documents in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case allegedly involving former Union minister Jagdish Tytler.

Filing a status report in a sealed cover before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Sanjiv Jain, the probe agency claimed that it had examined five witnesses and four documents, besides some video cassettes and CDs.

It, however, refused to reveal the names of the witnesses, apprehending threat to them.

Meanwhile, an application seeking a copy of the status report by senior counsel H.S. Phoolka on behalf of the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and November '84 Carnage Justice Committee was rejected by the court.

"Since the matter is under investigation and the issue of witness Jasbir Singh is pending before the High Court, I do not deem it fit to supply the copy of status report," the court said, posting the matter for September 3.

Counsel for the probe agency opposed the plea seeking copy of the status report, saying that it would not like to reveal the names of the witnesses due to threat perception.

Earlier, making an interjection, Sattu Singh, father of Jasbir Singh, sought the court's intervention by directing the CBI to record his son's statement through video conferencing.

The court, however, refused to pass any order, reminding him of an application by his counsel in this regard before the Delhi High Court, which has been posted for hearing on August 26.

The CBI had on September 29 last year sought to close the case against former Union minister Tytler, declaring Jasbir Singh, an alleged key witness who is settled in California, as untraced.

The CBI had been asked on December 19 to file its report under Section 173 of the CrPC after Jasbir Singh surfaced, expressing his willingness to depose against Tytler.

Jasbir had, however, expressed his inability to come to the country citing threat to his life.

The case relates to an incident on November 1, 1984, when a mob had set afire Gurdwara Pulbangash killing three persons.

Jasbir had told the Nanavati Commission on August 31, 2000, that "he had overheard Tytler rebuking his men on the night of November 3, 1984...for nominal killing of Sikhs in his constituency ."

A matter related to his testimony is pending before the Delhi High Court. Jasbir had earlier expressed his inability to come to the country for recording his testimony and had expressed his willingness to record his testimony through video-conferencing.

Students patka burnt in US

Students patka burnt in US

14 May 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Pg 06

http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=14_05_2008_006_004&typ=0&pub=722
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTPunjab/Article/2008/05/
14/006/14_05_2008_006_004.jpg


THE SIKH community in New Jersey has demanded an inquiry into an incident in which a high school student allegedly set afire the "patka" worn by a fellow Sikh student, in an unprovoked attack.

The student suffered minor burns but it has raised outrage in the Sikh community, which has also asked the school to do more to combat discrimination.

The culprit, identified as 18-year-old Hightstown senior Garrett Green, was arrested hours later and charged with arson and criminal mischief. He has also been suspended from the school.

Police are investigating the incident which occurred on May 5 in Hightstown High School at Mercer County in New Jersey during a fire drill. The Sikh student, who is a teenager and would not like to be identified, was chatting with a fellow student when Green, whom he did not know, came up from behind and set the "patka" on fire using a lighter.

A teacher helped him to put out the fire. The "patka", shown by his relatives, had at least two big burn holes.

"No mother should have to worry that her child could be hurt at school because of the way he looks," said Sukhjot Kaur, the teenager's mother.

Sikh Coalition, a community organisation, urged the school to take immediate steps to address the concerns of the community .

It recommended that Hightstown School conduct an assembly to explain what had happened and why the attacker's behaviour was atrocious, publish an article about the incident in the newsletter, mandate teacherled discussions and do its utmost to ensure the attacker was held accountable.