Wednesday, April 30, 2008

HC notice to SGPC over Gurbani telecast contract



HC notice to SGPC over Gurbani telecast contract
29 Apr 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Pg 06

THE GURU Nanak Dev Universal Brotherhood Society (GNDUBS) has moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court against the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee for entering into an exclusive contract with a television channel for telecasting Gurbani from Harmandir Sahib.
Pleading for setting aside the contract between the SGPC and ETC Punjabi channel, the Society said the SGPC's decision amounted to commercialisation of the Gurbani and was against the basic tenets of Sikhism.

After the preliminary hearing, the Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Vijender Jain and Justice Jaswant Singh, issued notice to the SGPC, the Union Home Ministry and ETC channel for May 2.

In its PIL, the Society submitted that this exclusive contract was also against the provisions of the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925.

As per the petition, the SGPC charged Rs 2 crore while signing the contract that granted worldwide, absolute rights for 11 years at Rs 50 lakh per year. Besides, the SGPC would get 10 per cent of the gross revenue generated from the advertisements immediately before and after the Gurbani programme.

The petitioner submitted, "The Gurbani being a fountainhead of Sikhs' spirituality that motivates members of the community to cherish higher values of life, is not the property of the SGPC alone as the same belongs to the whole humanity as defined by the Gurus in their Bani enshrined in Guru Granth Sahib." Therefore, the petitioner stated, Gurbani could not be made a tool of earning profit for the SGPC and other channels telecasting it against the basic principles of Sikhism.

The Bench fixed May 2 as the next date of hearing. The main writ petition of Tata Sky seeking directions to the Zee group-owned ETC to provide the facility of telecasting Gurbani to its DTH subscribers at a reasonable price, will also come up for further hearing on that day.

Notice of motion on DTOs THE DIVISION Bench of Chief Justice Vijender Jain and Justice Jaswant Singh on Monday issued a notice of motion to the Punjab government and others on a petition challenging the move of the Punjab government to withdraw the trafficticket-sorting charge from courts and pass it to the district transport officers.

In their petition, lawyers H. C. Arora and A. P. S. Shergill had submitted that the state government had not shown even elementary courtesy to consult the High Court before tinkering with its powers. This decision of the state government was against the principles of natural justice, they further alleged.

The Bench issued notices for May 16 and asked the state government counsel to seek instructions from the government for withdrawing the impugned circulars. Family gets relief THE PUNJAB and Haryana High Court has ordered that Rs 4 lakh as compensation be granted to the family of a Rothak-based housewife killed in an accident resulting from the negligence of the railway authorities.

Santosh, 42, had died after the gates at a railway crossing on the Kucca Beri road in Rohtak had fallen on her head on May 21, 2004. Stay issued THE DIVISION Bench of Justice K.S. Garewal and Justice Daya Chaudhary on Monday stayed the April 11 orders of the Haryana Government, wherein it had removed Gurdev Singh as president of the Municipal Council at Sohna in Gurgaon. The Bench issued notices to the Haryana Urban Development and Local Bodies Secretary among others for May 14. The petitioner has ascribed political motive to the government's action and referred to a land dispute in the municipal area and his refusal to be party to it.

THE GURU Nanak Dev Universal Brotherhood Society (GNDUBS) has moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court against the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee for entering into an exclusive con- tract with a television channel for telecasting Gurbani from Har- mandir Sahib. Pleading for setting aside the contract between the SGPC and ETC Punjabi channel, the Society said the SGPC's decision amount- ed to commercialisation of the Gurbani and was against the basic tenets of Sikhism. After the preliminary hearing, the Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Vijender Jain and Justice Jaswant Singh, issued no- tice to the SGPC, the Union Home Ministry and ETC channel for May 2. In its PIL, the Society submitted that this exclusive contract was also against the provisions of the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925. As per the petition, the SGPC charged Rs 2 crore while signing the contract that granted world- wide, absolute rights for 11 years at Rs 50 lakh per year. Besides, the SGPC would get 10 per cent of the gross revenue generated from the advertisements immediately be- fore and after the Gurbani pro- gramme. The petitioner submitted, "The Gurbani being a fountainhead of Sikhs' spirituality that motivates members of the community to cherish higher values of life, is not the property of the SGPC alone as the same belongs to the whole hu- manity as defined by the Gurus in their Bani enshrined in Guru Granth Sahib." Therefore, the peti- tioner stated, Gurbani could not be made a tool of earning profit for the SGPC and other channels tele- casting it against the basic princi- ples of Sikhism. The Bench fixed May 2 as the next date of hearing. The main writ petition of Tata Sky seeking directions to the Zee group-owned ETC to provide the facility of tele- casting Gurbani to its DTH sub- scribers at a reasonable price, will also come up for further hearing on that day. Notice of motion on DTOs THE DIVISION Bench of Chief Jus- tice Vijender Jain and Justice Jaswant Singh on Monday issued a notice of motion to the Punjab gov- ernment and others on a petition challenging the move of the Punjab government to withdraw the traffic- ticket-sorting charge from courts and pass it to the district transport officers. In their petition, lawyers H. C. Arora and A. P. S. Shergill had sub- mitted that the state government had not shown even elementary courtesy to consult the High Court before tinkering with its powers. This decision of the state govern- ment was against the principles of natural justice, they further alleged. The Bench issued notices for May 16 and asked the state government counsel to seek instructions from the government for withdrawing the impugned circulars. Family gets relief THE PUNJAB and Haryana High Court has ordered that Rs 4 lakh as compensation be granted to the fam- ily of a Rothak-based housewife killed in an accident resulting from the negligence of the railway au- thorities. Santosh, 42, had died after the gates at a railway crossing on the Kucca Beri road in Rohtak had fall- en on her head on May 21, 2004. Stay issued THE DIVISION Bench of Justice K.S. Garewal and Justice Daya Chaudhary on Monday stayed the April 11 orders of the Haryana Gov- ernment, wherein it had removed Gurdev Singh as president of the Municipal Council at Sohna in Gur- gaon. The Bench issued notices to the Haryana Urban Development and Local Bodies Secretary among others for May 14. The petitioner has ascribed political motive to the government's action and referred to a land dispute in the municipal area and his refusal to be party to it.

Source: http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=29_04_2008_006_005&typ=0&pub=722

Only 2 pc riot relief cases approved



Only 2 pc riot relief cases approved
29 Apr 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Pg 02
Bureaucracy creating hurdles, alleges Danga Peerat Welfare Association

THE BUREAUCRACY has approved only 2 per cent of the total applications of the riot-affected victims in Punjab, said the Danga Peerat Welfare Association today, a day after Patiala Divisional Commissioner suspended three Ludhiana Deputy Commissioner office employees for largescale irregularities in files pertaining to release of compensation.
Association president Surjit Singh told Hindustan Times that though the commissioner's action was in the right direction, the bureaucracy was creating hurdles all over the state.

Citing figures, he said in Jalandhar, around 1,100 people applied for red cards, but only 13 cases were approved. In Amritsar, out of the total applications of 850, approvals were given to only 45 cases. Similarly, only 65 cases were approved in Patiala against 1,000 applications, he added.

Blaming the apathetic attitude of bureaucracy for the low approvals, Surjit Singh said applications were rejected even after victim families provided rent receipts of houses they stayed in after the riots broke out in Delhi.

"Astonishingly, officers ask for proof like bank passbooks," he said, asking how could one have accounts in banks after losing everything in riots. "It's ironical that when the state government had received a grant of Rs 200 crore for the riot victims, the bureaucracy was creating hurdles," he added.

Surjit Singh said he would meet Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal in a day or two to apprise him of the situation.

On the other hand, Ludhiana Deputy Commissioner Sumer Singh Gurjar denied the allegations. He said Surjit Singh had been mounting pressure on the government unnecessarily. He said the cases were rejected as they were not genuine.

"Even the Divisional Commissioner in his inspection found fake addresses of four out of the six applications," he said. He said they could reject an approved application until forwarded to the higher authorities. "Sometime, after approving, you get to know that things were not genuine," he said, claiming they had fully complied with the law. Genuine claimants will get compensation: Govt All genuine victims of 1984 anti-Sikh riots, whose claims were rejected by the authorities, will receive a compensation of Rs 2 lakh each within a month, a senior Punjab government official said on Monday. But they will have to establish that they are genuine claimants, Divisional Commissioner (Patiala) S.K. Ahluwalia, who is inquiring into rejection of 1,200 cases of compensation for the victims, said.

Tracking the case AROUND 12,000 people had applied for the grant meant for the riot affected families after the SAD-BJP government asked for fresh applications on the demand that a large number of the victims never got any support. The Patiala Divisional Commissioner on Sunday had ended three employees of the Ludhiana Deputy Commissioner office, alleging they had rejected over 100 applications after approving them on file. The Commissioner had said even a single line of reason was not given for changing the decision, raising suspicions

Khalistan tableau thrown out of Toronto Baisakhi


Khalistan tableau thrown out of Toronto Baisakhi
29 Apr 2008 Pg02 Hindustantimes Chandigarh

PRO-KHALISTAN activists were not allowed to lead the annual Baisakhi parade here with a float glorifying anti-India Sikh militants.
They were forced to pull the tableau out of Sunday's parade. However, they still managed to have their way by walking with a huge pro-‘Khalistan' banner at the head of the parade, which was attended by more than 50,000 people.

Before the parade started, its organisers - Ontario Sikh and Gurdwara Council - told the Khalistani activists that the float glorifying the slain separatist leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and other militants would not be allowed to be part of the procession.

The organisers feared top Canadian political leaders would not attend the celebrations because of the float, which glorified violence.

Having faced flak for attending a Baisakhi parade last year in Surrey near Vancouver in which Air India plot mastermind Talwinder Singh Parmar was glorified, Canadian politicians now avoid attending such functions - as in Vancouver three weeks ago.

The pro-Khalistan float, which was ordered out of the parade Sunday, depicted the destruction of the Akal Takht - the highest temporal seat of the Sikhs - after the Army action at Harmandar Sahib in Amritsar in 1984.

Apart from Bhindranwale, it also glorified Sukha and Jinda, who killed former Indian Army chief General A.S. Vaidya, whom they blamed for Operation Bluestar, as part of which the assault on Harmandar Sahib was launched.

The militants had parked their float-carrying vehicle at the head of the parade, but the police quietly took them away before the start of the pro cession. They raised pro-Khalistan slogans as a police car escorted them away from the scene.

Having lost their float, the pro-Khalistan activists tried to lead the parade with a banner that read: "Sikh Homeland Khalistan". Again, they were pushed back to the second position by the organisers.

When the parade reached Nathan Phillips Square at the heart of Toronto, the radicals waved the Khalistan banner and raised pro-Khalistan slogans in the presence of top national leaders, including two Canadian opposition leaders Stephane Dion and Jack Layton, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty and many MPs.

In their speeches, the organisers described the 1984 riots as one of the many "injustices" done to the Sikhs in India. Then they listed their grievances before the Canadian leaders present at the parade.

Urging the opposition parties not to let the government to enact immigration changes, they said these were aimed at visible immigrant communities. Since most immigrants, including Sikhs, traditionally vote for the Liberal party (now in Opposition), the ruling Conservative party sent no representative to the celebrations.

Politically correct ? Police step in to remove float glorifying Bhindranwale, Sukha, Jinda ? Banner-carrying participants also pushed to second line from lead ? Liberal party leaders attend annual parade ? In speeches, organisers cite 1984 riots among ‘injustices' done to Sikhs in India

HC issues notice to SGPC


HC issues notice to SGPC
COMMERCIALIZATION OF GURBANI

30 Apr 2008 Times of India Chandigarh - Page 4

Chandigarh: The decision of the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) to enter into an exclusive contract with a television channel for telecasting 'gurbani' from Harmandir Sahib, Amritsar, amounted to its commercialization, which was against the basic Sikh tenets, according to the city-based Gurunanak Dev Universal Brotherhood Society. The group has moved the Punjab & Haryana High Court to set aside the contract between the SGPC and ETC Punjabi channel.
The petition, filed through the society's secretary, advocate Hridey Pal Singh, said the exclusive contract was also against the provisions of the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925 and deserved to be set aside, being void ab initio, as a contract against the public policy contravening the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872 could not be sustained. The SGPC charged Rs 2,01,00,000 at the time of signing the contract that grants its absolute rights worldwide for 11 years at Rs 50 lakh per year. In addition the SGPC gets 10% of the gross revenue generated from the advertisements immediate before and after a 'gurbani' programme , the petitioner said, adding "it is not known to which account this money has been deposited which accrued in pursuance of the contract."
The petitioner further submitted "the gurbani, being the fountainhead of Sikh spirituality that motivates Sikhs to cherish higher values of life, is not the property of the SGPC alone". Therefore, he argued, the 'gurbani' could not be "made a tool of earning profit for the SGPC and other telecasting channels against the basic Sikh principles". Apart from this commercial nature of the contract, there is no mention of the income of over Rs 5 crore accrued from ETC channel in the SGPC budgets from 2002-2009, though an
expenditure of Rs 12,80,000 has been shown for these years nor is there any reference to the amount received by way of 10% of gross revenue generated by advertisements shown before and after a 'gurbani' telecast.
A division bench issued notice to SGPC, union home ministry and ETC channel for May 2, when the main writ petition of Tata Sky seeking directions to the Zee groupowned ETC to provide the facility of telecasting 'gurbani' to its DTH subscribers at a reasonable price, is due to come up for further consideration.

15 year old sacrificed at dera - Body exhumed


29 Apr 2008
15 year old sacrificed at dera - Body exhumed

Corpse has gashes, claim witnesses
Gurpreet Singh Mehak
Fatehgarh Sahib

IT SHOCKED everyone when Kuldeep Singh, father of a 15-year-old, today approached the Amloh police to report that a dera priest had sacrificed his son.

The body of 15-year-old Amandeep Singh of Mandi Ahmedgarh in district Sangrur was then exhumed in the presence of his parents, the police and other people at Dera Bharion Nath in village Paheri near Amloh in district Fatehgarh Sahib.

Fatehgarh Sahib Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Dr Kaustabh Sharma and Amloh's Naib Tehsildar Jaswinder Singh supervised the task. The team took the body to the civil hospital at Amloh for autopsy.

Briefing newsmen at the hospital, the SSP said the child had been putting up at the dera for at least a month-and-a-half and the managers claimed he had died of snakebite.

The dera management claim having put the child in grave after performing his last rites as per their rituals, say the police.

Child's father Kuldip refuted the claim of the dera managers.

After receiving the complaint, the police quickly moved into action and dug up the grave.

People claimed witnessing chopping marks on the body. The SSP said the autopsy report would lay the course for further action.

Amandeep's maternal uncle Preetpal Singh also said the child had been sacrificed, as occult arts were practiced in the dera.

"When the relatives received the news of Amandeep's death yesterday, they reached the dera to claim his body, but the dera managers began threatening them instead," said Preetpal.

Amandeep was a student at Gandhi School in Mandi Ahmedgarh and had not returned there after passing Class VI examinations, the results of which were declared on March 31.

Since that day, he had become a sworn disciple of the dera

Source:
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTPunjab/Article/2008/04/29/003/29_04_2008_003_006.jpg

Barapind acquitted in all cases


Barapind acquitted in all cases

30 Apr 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh


Former KCF (Panjwar) ultra may be freed today from Nabha jail

FORMER KHALISTAN Commando Force (Panjwar) militant Kulbir Singh Barapind is set to be a free man.

With a local court today acquitting him in a case pertaining to killing of four members of a family, Kulbir has now been acquitted in all the three criminal cases he was being prosecuted under as per the terms of the Indo-US extradition treaty .

Kulbir, who was extradited from United States of America in 2006, is likely to be released from Nabha jail tomorrow.

Kulbir was actually booked in 32 criminal cases, including the killing of nine BSP men in Nakodar, during the days of terrorism.

Punjab Police, along with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), had fought a long legal battle to get him extradited from the US. Later, a US court allowed his extradition and instructed Punjab Police to try him only in three cases under general law and not under any special law.

Today, the court of Additional Sessions Judge B.K. Mehta announced his acquittal for failure of the prosecution to provide adequate evidence against the accused.

Kulbir was accused of murdering four members of a family, including three brothers and wife of the eldest one, at their Tarkhan Majara village residence on the night of September 9, 1992 before fleeing to the US.

Eyewitnesses Sohan Singh and his wife Gurmail Kaur, father and mother of the deceased brothers, did not identify Kulbir during the trial.

Sohan Singh said police officials themselves dictated the FIR and he only signed it. The former KCF terrorist was earlier acquitted in the murder case of the former Akali MLA from Banga constituency, Balwant Singh Sarhal, a Kanungo and his two gunmen. Kulbir was accused of killing the trio at Cheema Kalan village at Goraya in 1992.

He was also proved not guilty in the Sahib Singh murder case of Dhakka Colony in Phillaur.

Terror trial Extradited from US in 2006, Kulbir was actually booked in 32 criminal cases A US court, however, instructed Punjab Police to try him only in three cases under general law Former KCF ultra was earlier acquitted in murder case of former Akali MLA from Banga Balwant Singh Sarhal



Source :
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTPunjab/Article/2008/04/30/003/30_04_2008_003_002.jpg

Former KCF ultra a free man


30 Apr 2008 Indian Express Chandigarh

Former KCF ultra a free man


Kulbir, who was extradited from the USA in 2006 for trial in three murder cases, acquitted in the third and last case
ANJU AGNIHOTRI CHABA
JALANDHAR

FORMER dreaded Khalistan Commando Force (Panjwar) terrorist Kulbir Singh Barapind, alias Kulbira, who was extradited from the USA in 2006 for trial in three murder cases, was acquitted in the third and last case today.

The court of Additional Sessions Judge BK Mehta acquitted Kulbir, a resident of Bara Pind village in Jalandhar, for want of evidences.

The case relates to the killing of three brothers and wife of the eldest one in Tarkhan Majara village on September 9, 1992. The parents of the killed brothers, Sohan Singh and Gurmail Kaur, who were eyewitnesses, could not identify Kulbir.

Cops were astonished when the parents gave a statement in the court that the FIR was dictated by the police officials and they only singed on it.

Notably, earlier too, he was released in the case of murders of a former Akali MLA of Banga, Balwant Singh Sarhal, a kanungo and two gunmen of MLA in Cheema Kalan village, under Goraya police station in 1992.

A few days back, he was acquitted in the second case of murder of Sahib Singh of Dhakka Colony in Phillaur, again for want of evidences.

In 1994, Kulbir had escaped to the USA, where he was arrested. The Punjab Police had fought a long legal battle to get him extradited and a US court allowed his return with a rider that he be tried in only three cases under general law not under any special law.

Because of this condition, a TADA case against Kulbir was dropped in November 2006.

Though he was booked in about 32 cases, including killing of nine BSP men in Nakodar, the Punjab Police could extradite him for only three murder cases.

Parents of the victims fail to identify the former terrorist



Source : http://epaper.indianexpress.com/Web/Article/2008/04/30/545/30_04_2008_545_004.jpg

Sikh students in Punjab fined for wearing Turban



Source : Rozana Spokesman 30-Apr-2008
http://www.rozanaspokesman.com/Apr%5C30%5CFRS1.jpg
http://www.rozanaspokesman.com/Apr%5C30%5CFRS2.jpg

-----


3 students punished for wearing turbans
30 Apr 2008 Indian Express

Principal Veena Malhotra said the students have flouted school rules which state ‘the students upto class X should wear patka'. But she failed to produce any such rule written in the school diary
EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE
MOHALI

AFTER France, it is now Mohali banning students from wearing turbans in schools. Three students of Class X of Lawrence Public School were today asked to leave their classrooms by the school authorities for wearing turbans and were made to sit in a separate room as punishment.

Principal Veena Malhotra said they had flouted the rules of the school which reads ‘the students upto class X should wear patka but she failed to produce any such rule written in the school diary.

The Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee, however, demanded action against the school.

Inderjeet Singh, Gursewak Singh and Ravinder Singh, all class X students, had come to school wearing turbans. About 9.30 am, the school principal visited the class and asked these three students to get up and come out. "She asked us not to wear turbans in the school, claiming that it doesn't look nice," claimed Gursewak Singh.

They were asked to take their school bags out of the class and were directed not to attend any class for the whole day as punishment.

The authorities said that they will impose a fine of Rs 50 per day if they wear turbans in the school, one of the students said.

Principal Veena Malhotra said their dress code does not allow turbans and it is mandatory for students of upto Class X.

"We have prescribed patka for Sikh students and they should abide by the rules of the school. We asked them to sit in a separate room just because they flouted the norms. We will not let them attend classes if they wear turbans again," she added.

But she failed to produce any such rule existing in the rulebook and any such norm ever being communicated to the students.

The SGPC has demanded action against the school.

Hardeep Singh, member of SGPC from Mohali, said they will protest against the disrepute brought to the Sikh religion by the school authorities and will take up the matter with the SGPC.

"Turban is a part of Sikhism and nobody can deter Sikh students from wearing them," he added.


Source : http://epaper.indianexpress.com/artMailDisp.aspx?article=30_04_2008_541_003&typ=0&pub=320
http://epaper.indianexpress.com/Web/Article/2008/04/30/541/30_04_2008_541_003.jpg


---

Mohali school in 'patka' vs turban debate
30 Apr 2008 Times of India Chandigarh Pg 21



Mohali: While the issue regarding Sikh students not being allowed to wear turbans in France is yet to be resolved, a related controversy is brewing up in a Mohali school. The management of Lawrence Public School here seems to have triggered another debate after three students were barred from attending classes for wearing turbans instead of patkas, as required by school rules.
Reacting sharply to it, Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) chief Avtar Singh Makkar has asked the police to register a case against the school management.
However, school principal Veena Malhotra defended her decision saying she was just following the rules of the school as per which students till class X have to wear patkas whereas students of class XI and XII wear turbans. The three class X pupils — Gursewak Singh, Inderjeet Singh and Ravi Inder Singh — were asked to sit separately in another classroom before they were asked strictly not to wear turbans. 'For the last five days one of the student was coming to school wearing a turban, and today he was joined by two more. I had to take strict action,' said Malhotra.
She said that one of them asked the teacher to call his father, and he was allowed to use the school phone. 'Since then the situation went out of the control. I only asked them to follow the school rules, and that is within my authority,' she said.
The SGPC chief said this rule of the school was unacceptable and illogical as they have been encouraging Sikh children to wear 'dastar' (turban ) . Makkar further added that the turban is the pride of every Sikh as stated in Gurbani: 'Sabat surat dastar sar.'
However, reacting to the anger of the high priest, the principal said this was not a matter of religion but school rules. 'I too am a born Sikh, and out of the 1,000 students about 75% are Sikhs and 80% staff is from the same religion. How can I challenge our own faith,' she said, adding that the rule was made just for uniformity.
However, Makkar does not appear to agree with the logic, and insisted on an FIR being registered against them. 'This is not France but Punjab where we are committed to safeguard Sikhism,' he said

---

Turban Ban Sparks Row in School
Turbaned students detained, parents threaten to withdraw them; SGPC seeks police action

30 Apr 2008 Hindustantimes Chandigarh Times Pg 01


THE BAN imposed by Lawerance Public Senior Secondary School in Sector 51, S.A.S. Nagar, on wearing of turbans by students up to Class X led to a major controversy today when three turbaned Class X students were made to sit in the sickroom as punishment for what school principal Veena Malhotra terms "violation of school rules".

While Malhotra is adamant not to allow students up to Class X to wear turbans, the affected parents have threatened to withdraw their wards from the school.

After being informed about the incident by the aggrieved parents, the SGPC called for strict and immediate police action against the school authorities for "hurting Sikh sentiments".

Calling it a "very serious issue", SGPC president Avtar Singh Makkar said he had asked the S.A.S. Nagar SSP to register a case against the school authorities. "If turbans are banned in Punjab, how will we fight the turban ban in other countries?" he asked, adding that he would also raise the issue with Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal and the SAS Nagar Deputy Commissioner.

It all began when Class X students Gursewak Singh from Phase VI, Ravi Inder Singh from Phase I and Inderjeet Singh from Kharar came to the school wearing turbans and the class teacher sent them to the principal. "When I confronted them, they all felt sorry and said they would not wear turbans again," said the principal.

Malhotra said Gursewak was coming to school wearing a turban for the last five days despite being asked not to by his class teacher. "Today, two of his classmates also came with turbans, which called for strict measures," she said.

Malhotra said Gursewak's father, along with some mediapersons, had come to the school to raise an objection, but she told them that she would not allow anyone to break the rule. "Things have been blown out of proportion. Tying a 'patka' is not only less time-consuming, but it is also easier to carry. Our parent- teacher association had held a meeting a decade ago, where it was decided to allow turbans only for Class XI and XII students. "Most of the students and faculty of this school are Sikhs and even I belong to a Sikh family, but I fail to understand the objection," said Malhotra.

Some SGPC members and police officials also met the principal this evening to discuss the issue. Meanwhile, the Kalgidhar Sewak Jatha from the Phase IV gurdwara has decided to stage a dharna outside the school tomorrow.

Gursewak's father Rajendra Singh, who has lodged a formal complaint with the SGPC, said he would withdraw his son from the school if he was not allowed to wear a turban.

SP (City) Varinder Pal Singh said an inquiry had been marked to DSP (City-II) Swarndeep Singh.

Interestingly, there is no hard and fast rule on wearing of turbans in government schools. "It is up to students whether they want to wear a turban or not," some government school teachers told
Hindustan Times.
likenitin@gmail.com


Source :
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/ArticleText.aspx?article=30_04_2008_161_010&kword=&mode=1
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/Web/HTPunjab/Article/2008/04/30/161/30_04_2008_161_010.jpg

Monday, April 21, 2008

European Parliamentarian to take up turban issue with EU

European Parliamentarian to take up turban issue with EU
19 Apr 2008 Pg 04 Hindustantimes Chandigarh

Compensation is not reparation

Compensation is not reparation - Kumar
19 Apr 2008 Pg 04 Hindustantimes Chandigarh


Saturday, April 19, 2008

Kaonke 'tortured nearly to death' 2

Kaonke 'tortured nearly to death' 2
18 Apr 2008 Pg 12 Hindustantimes Chandigarh




Kaonke 'tortured nearly to death' 1

Kaonke 'tortured nearly to death' 1
18 Apr 2008 Pg 12 Hindustantimes Chandigarh


Kaonke killing - Makkar for legal action

Kaonke killing - Makkar for legal action
19 Apr 2008 Pg 02 Hindustantimes Chandigarh


Friday, April 18, 2008

Anti-Sikh riots a pogrom: Khushwant

http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/may/09sikh.htm
Anti-Sikh riots a pogrom: Khushwant

Basharat Peer in New Delhi

Celebrated writer and journalist Khushwant Singh on Wednesday, deposing before the Nanavati Commission, probing the anti-Sikh riots of 1984 after the assassination of then prime minister, Indira Gandhi by her two Sikh bodyguards, said that the police were mute spectators while rioting was on.

"On October 31, 1984, I came out of my house, near Ambassador Hotel and from the gate near the road, I saw a mob burning a taxi, belonging to a Sikh. From a distance of 10 yards, I saw around 30 policemen, an inspector, who was armed and a sub-inspector, standing across the road. The policemen did nothing to prevent the mob from burning the taxi," Singh told the commission.

The mob had burnt shops in the adjacent Khan Market and had attacked a gurdwara nearby. Thereafter the mob burnt cars sent to repairs to Sukhwant Singh, a mechanic, he added.

While watching the incident happen, his Hindu neighbours prodded him to come inside as his life could be in danger if the mob saw him, he said.

On November 1, 1984, morning, Singh had been told by friends to be careful, as he could be the target of a mob attack, as he had returned the Padma Bhushan awarded to him, in protest against Operation Bluestar.

Singh said he had made a call to then President Zail Singh, seeking help as he was informed by his son-in-law that a mob was approaching his house.

Salman Haider, who later became foreign secretary, had informed Singh's son-in-law about it.

But Singh was not allowed to speak to the President and his secretary told him that the President had advised him to stay in a Hindu's house.

"I felt like a refugee in my country. In fact, I felt like a Jew in Nazi Germany," Singh told the commission.

When riot victims lawyer, H S Phoolka, questioned Singh whether he tried to contact the police for help, he replied, ''After I saw what the police were doing, I thought it pointless to ask for police help."

"I thought if I call the police, the mob would be on me," Singh said.

Commenting on the involvement of the then Congress government in the riots, Singh said probably the government of the day had a hand in it as it was organised violence.

But he refused to call the 1984 riots 'Hindu-Sikh riots', saying it was a one-sided riot. There was no retaliation from Sikhs, even in Punjab, where they form a majority, he explained.

The comparison with the Nazis' elimination of Jews in Germany was obvious when Singh said, "It was a pogrom."

Adding that it was the saddest day of his life and that he was pained as he had never seen such riots earlier, Singh said he was embittered as many innocent Sikhs were killed because of the rash action of two Sikhs.

Khushwant Singh has all along written about the 1984 anti-Sikh riots and even mentioned it in his book My Bleeding Punjab.

The next hearing of the commission will be on May 16, when former Delhi chief minister Madan Lal Khurana will depose. Air Chief Marshal Arjun Singh and politician Ram Vilas Paswan will depose before the commission on May 17 and 18 respectively.

1984: Assassination and revenge

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/witness/october/31/newsid_3961000/3961851.stm

1984: Assassination and revenge

At 9:20am on 31 October 1984 India's prime minister Indira Gandhi was shot by two of her security guards in the garden of her home at No 1, Safdarjung Road in Delhi.

The attack led to rioting on a grand scale across India as Hindus took their revenge on Sikhs. At least 1,000 people are thought to have died and the army eventually intervened to quell the violence.

The assassination itself was revenge for the raid on Sikhism's holiest shrine in Amritsar to flush out separatist militants who had taken refuge there.

Your memories of Indira Gandhi:

I was in 4th grade and in Chennai (then Madras).

I still remember the shock that passed through the city learning the news. Panic spread like wild fire and the city shut down fearing riots.

My mother came and picked me up when the school closed.

All the way home, I remember seeing police jeeps cruising trying to keep control.

Later on, I remember, a lot of India grieved her like they would grieve a family member's loss.
Lavanya Ramanujan, India

I was about 13 years old when this happened. So many years have passed but but the pain remains - for what happened to the Sikh community, for the failure of our democracy to protect the vulnerable and for the failure of our justice system to bring to book the perpetrators of the crimes against the innocent.

Indira Gandhi's death was a loss for the nation, but nothing as compared to the loss of confidence each citizen of this country suffered in the very existence of this nation and its sustainability.

We as a nation really failed to protect our own citizens and the principles we claim to propound.

I, as a citizen of India, and having lived in the Punjab for a larger part of my life, salute the diehard and brotherly spirit of the Sikhs and apologise for the failures of our people.

Today the Sikh community, given their brave spirit, has moved on with life, but for many, the loss was too much to bear.

We lost such individuals to the arms of antinational forces or to other nations where they migrated to.

For all the hype that India gets in the international media, we must remember that we have many black chapters in our history.

Gujarat was a repeat of 1984 and we as a nation continue to fail on most crucial matters.

So much for a Security Council seat and the superpower status when our own house is on fire.
Albert Savio, India

My whole body starts trembling whenever I recall those days. It was the 1st of November, 1984 the day after the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi was brutally killed by four Sikh ¿extremist¿ who were her bodyguards too.

We were having evening tea in our house situated in a rural area of Delhi called Narela. Suddenly somebody knocked at the door. My father went to see who it was and found that it was his friend Abbas Ali who had come to inform us that a cluster of around 200 "fanatics" was marching towards our house and they had already set fire to and looted two Sikh houses in our locality and were on the way to our house.


My brother and I were forced to dress up like girls and had to tie up our hairs as girls do, just to hide our identity as Sikh children

Inderbir Singh Duggal, India
We had very little time to react, we decided to lock the house, and went to one of our neighbor's house to hide us.

As a six-year-old child, I could not understand what was going on and why.

My father and my uncle had to cut their hair so that nobody could identify them as Sikh. My brother and I were forced to dress up like girls and had to tie up our hairs as girls do, just to hide our identity as Sikh children.

After half an hour, we heard that our house had been looted and it was on fire. None of us could sleep that night.

The next day all of us went to see our house and the only thing we saw were ashes all around - nothing was left.

The atmosphere was still very hot in the city and we were not secure.

At around 10:30 in the morning on the 2nd of November, a police van came and they took us to the police station and from there we were shifted to a riot victim camp.

There we met so many of our relatives who had also lost everything. In fact, some of them had lost their loved ones too.

We stayed in the camp for around a week and when the atmosphere in the city became calm, we were shifted to our localities.

We stayed at our neighbor's house for around a month. Everybody from our colony used to invite us for breakfast, lunch or dinner and a month passed like that.

Since my father and my uncle were both in government service, they got government accommodation on riot victim grounds and we shifted to Timarpur, a state government colony. But those who were not in government services had to renovate their houses.

Can anyone imagine the amount of compensation we got from the government? It was Rs. 5000!

Now after 20 years, we have again managed to get our own house in Delhi, but still I cannot feel secure because incidents like the '84 riots are very common in India.

That time it was the Sikh community which was the target and recently something very similar, or I should say something worse than, the '84 riots happened with Muslims in Gujarat.

For me, the major causes behind these communal riots are poverty, jealousy (it is clear that the attacks on the Sikhs had less to do with love for Indira Gandhi and more to do with resentment against them because they were a well-to-do community in Delhi), and the lack of independent thinking, which allows politicians to manipulate religion and fool people into thinking that killing other people serves their religion.

What the '84 riots taught me is my own precarious position in the Indian nation but also the shallowness of identity and politics in the subcontinent and in human nature.
Inderbir Singh Duggal, India

I remember that day clearly. I was just under 5 years old.

My mother broke the news to me as she came to pick me from school at about 5pm.

I asked her in shock why she had been shot.

She had a hard time answering me.


I remember the shock that gripped the nation. I remember the mourning.

Praveen, India
And I remember that not many people knew Indira Gandhi was dead. State-controlled media, as for as I remember, had not yet broken the news!

All we had where I lived in South India was one state-run channel. My father had tuned in BBC radio following the news intently.

I remember the shock that gripped the nation. I remember the mourning.

For up to a week later there were no programmes on TV including my own favorite children's programme.

And at that age I knew some terrible things were happening in Punjab which I did not understand until much later.

Looking back at those days it makes me think how quickly time passes. How much has changed. Globalization, the age of Internet and instant news. We are no longer bound by state controlled media.

And yet in some ways how little has changed. It is disgusting that nobody has even properly apologised for the Sikh families who were murdered.

And the same political petty mindedness that was displayed then is still being displayed today.

It seems we have learned very little from the past. But those terrible events are to a large extent behind us. And in spite of some reservations about our politicians I look towards the future with hope.
Praveen, India

My Sikh mother's extended family, consisting of seven members living in Delhi at the time, were shocked by news of the death of Indira Gandhi.

The event just never seemed a possibility. They, and many others like us, were entirely apathetic to the burgeoning political Khalistan cause in neighbouring Punjab.

That all changed in the following days when their Hindu neighbours - acquaintances that they had known for years - turned on them and broke into their small dwelling with blood-soaked machetes.

My friend's dad, a street grocer, was fatally shot in the face whilst tending his stall.

Thousands of innocent Sikhs like them were massacred in the hysteria that swept Delhi for days.

The police and army were guilty bystanders during the witchhunt of any man, woman or child belonging to the Sikh faith.

And to this day, the overwhelming majority of the perpretators have not been brought to justice. The scars have not healed.
Gurinder Singh, USA

I was 10 years old at the time, living in Calcutta, India.


If it makes any difference to even one Sikh person or family, I want them to know that I am really sorry this happened to their community

Sanjay, USA
I remember being very upset that Indira Gandhi, or India Gandhi as she was fondly called, was murdered by her own body guards.

I saw many Sikhs being beaten and killed by angry mobs.

I recall my punjabi non-Sikh neighbor's car being smashed and burned.

I remember having Punjabi guests in our home at that time whose son was not to be found and his parents were inconsolable.

He later returned home after hiding in a cinema hall basement for two days.

I also remember that for years I believed that what had happened to the Sikh community was right and that the mobs were justified in making the Sikhs pay for their betrayal.

Now, as a more mature and sombre adult, I regret having thought and believed that way, but even more so I regret that no Indian government actually ever formally apologised to the Sikh community.

Even now, after two decades, I would occasionally meet a Sikh person who would recount how a loved one was killed and the surrounding family was devastated and their lives were never the same.

If it makes any difference to even one Sikh person or family, I want them to know that I am really sorry this happened to their community, and if it is any consolation for the heinous crimes committed against them, many Indians feel the same way.
Sanjay, USA

Oct 31st 1984 - I was 13 years old and in school (9.00am).

We were told that we are to go back home.

As a student, a day off from school was great.

We did not even think of the consequences of the events happening around us.

The next 10 days were the most horrifying in my history.

Sikhs being burnt alive. My father and I were trying to go to the airport, on the way we saw an oil tanker tipped over, and being set fire. The driver was a Sikh and he was burning too.

Never should any community in the world be subject to such atrocities.
Harihar, USA

I was in my third standard when this happened.

Around 10:00 am that day the school was closed for the day.

As we were walking back to our school bus, we walked past the staff room. I saw my teachers in tears, hugging each other, have a kind of tragic look on their faces.

Soon there was a rumour that our school principal passed away.

Later in the bus, one of the teachers announced that Indira Gandhi has been shot, and she was in hospital and asked us all to pray for her recovery.

By the time I reached home, there were a considerable number of people at my home, as we were the only people to own a TV in the neighbourhood.

One of my uncles was so optimistic [saying] that in some war a general was shot 30 times and saved by the doctors, and he said, "She is the prime minister and she has only 16 bullets, she will be alive."

I always wished if it was true. My family mourned as if it was death of a family member.

To this day, she is the Mother of two generations. Indira is India.
Raju, India

I was unfortunate to witness the carnage the Hindu mobs had inflicted on the Sikhs and their property.

I was approached by a militant Hindu BajRang Dal activist who urged me to attack and kill Sikhs.

I declined with shock. It reminded me of stories of Jews and Nazi germany. I fear this event has began the process of disintegration of my country India.

Many Sikhs who were once loyal citizens are now ardent seperatists for a independant Khalistan.
Ramesh Patel, India

I was a teenager at the time of Indira's assasination.

That noon I was scheduled to take my ailing grandmother by train for radiotherapy in Delhi.

Fortunately, the news came before we could leave and possibly saved our lives.


The neighbours turned on their neighbours and the Indian civilisation broke down in two separate societies

Arvind Singh, USA
This cerfew was only limited to the Sikhs as the mobs were free to roam around the city and raise slogans - Blood for Blood!

Our Hindu neighbours brought food and supplies for the next five days while we were confined to our homes by police cerfew.

Not all neighbours were as good as ours. In most places, the neighbours turned on their neighbours and the Indian civilisation broke down in two separate societies.

I no longer considered myself Indian and subsequently left India forever. The Sikhs will remember the massacre forever and we will make our best efforts to show the TRUTH to the world.

Shame to India, Gandhi family and the Congress Party that indulged in merciless killing of innocent people.
Arvind Singh, USA

I was 7 years old when the ghastly incidents unfolded in the summer and fall of 1984.

At that age I wasn't quite sure what was going on but I have been told many stories by my parents who protected me and my brother from murderous mobs in Delhi. We were fortunate enough to have lived in a relatively affluent part of South Delhi at that time and could take refuge during the worst of the riots at our Hindu friend's home.

I do remember one thing though - a red X on our house indicating that our house was inhabited by Sikhs, shameful for a "civilized", "secular" and "democratic" nation.
K Bains, Canada

I was 12 years old. It was the day of our annual performance benefit for our school held at the Music Academy of Madras.

We were at the Academy early that day, doing a full dress rehearsal when someone first said the president of India was shot dead. Soon the news was rectified and we found out that it was the prime minister. There was palpable fear and tension in the air.

We were shipped back to the school, and our parents were expected to come pick us up. We heard of gangs of men roaming the streets demanding all shops be closed and generally causing unrest.

It was late afternoon when my father showed up, a civil servant, on a borrowed bicycle from his peon.

I saw en route great many groups of men, as they had told us earlier, roaming the streets. I saw one man with a huge sword, yes, a sword. Not a machete, of which there were many, and many cricket bats and other assorted weapons, real and improvised.

It was a miracle to reach home safely. My mother and my younger brother had walked home, by then and were waiting for us anxiously.

We found out later there was much violence, in particular against Sikhs, and much of it was concentrated near the area of my school.

I was very troubled and anguished - both for Mrs Gandhi, who we heard was taken to the hospital in the bloody arms of her daughter-in-law, Mrs Sonia Gandhi - as well as the victims of violence of that day, and the many following days.

It is a shame, that we can not as a human society find our way past revenge and retribution.
Vennila nr Kain, USA

I was in Patna, Bihar. My mother was ending two days of fasting for the Chatt festival in the state of Bihar. Our family had gone to the ghats of the Ganges, where my mother offered prayers to the Sun God.

It was an auspicious day for everybody in Bihar. After the exchange of greetings and blessings from elders the children of the household settled down in front of the television.

Suddenly the regular programming was interuppted and newscaster Salma Sultan broke the news that Mrs Gandhi was attacked by gunmen this morning and that she is undergoing an emergency operation.

The mood in the house turned from joy to shock in a second. A minute later the phone rang and my uncle on the other side asked my father if he heard the news.

Soon the word spread and people collected in groups talking about what is next after Mrs Gandhi, who is responsible, is there a bigger plot etc.

The evening news bought the offical confirmation of her assassination.

The organised roiting and killing of Sikhs that followed was shameful.
Mukul, USA

I was 12 years old when when the attack on the Golden Temple occurred and innocent citizens were killed.

The feelings and pain of being violated are still raw. The death of Mrs Gandhi is sad because death is sad but I must say that it was expected.

As Sikhs we saw her no different than many in American see Osama bin Laden.
Varinder Singh Rathore, USA

The one who would have killed Hitler would have been a hero, The one who would have killed Saddam would have been a hero. The ones who killed Indira Gandhi is and still are heroes.

It's amusing how the Mr Mehrotra in the news article talks about democracy when the same regime barred the human rights activists and journalists from entering Punjab, when Indira Gandhi was committing the worst massacre of Sikhs in Punjab.

Not only this, the party workers of same party were butchering Sikhs in Delhi.

It really perturbs that the Sikhs who gave 85% for freedom struggle for a country that never existed before (India which is a creation of British Empire) were and are still being tortured by the same country and Indira Gandhi's role is not unfolded by the media.
Harmeet Singh, Punjab

I was in school, when someone floated a rumour that Indira Gandhi had been shot.

Later our principal told us to take a half day and go straight home. We got the confirmed news in the evening. We couldn't believe that it could have actually happened - it was like a cruel joke had been played on India.

The most eerie and dastardly aspect was that the deed had been perpetrated by those who had sworn to protect her.

Everyone was sobbing - it was a horrendous day.
Madhu, India

I was 12 years old and was in school when this news broke. Everybody in our house was sad and we were angry that her own bodyguards had done this to her.

Then the riots broke out and I felt ashamed to be an Indian. Innocent men women and children of a brave and sacrificing community were killed on the streets of Delhi for no fault of theirs.

This is something I will never forget. Once I grew up and learnt more about the woman, I realised that she ended up reaping what she sowed.

For me Beant and Satwant Singh are heroes who freed the country from the evil clutches of the Gandhi mafia.
Annie Singh, USA

I was studying in first standard in a government lower primary school then.

One teacher, called Mohammed came to our class to announce this news. He was a strong person in our calculations, but he was shivering.

The school remained closed for a week. At that time we too hated Sikhs but we never heard the news of mass carnage which took place in the capital of India as a revenge to the prime minister's death.

Most of our media concealed the truth, and I was not in an age to understand the seriousness of those killings.

Now after two decades the picture is clear to me. I am a journalist now and trying to tell the world we were wrong. We are guilty.
Savad Rahman, India

I remember watching news coverage of the rioting that [followed] the assassination of Indira Gandhi.

I saw a Sikh woman running with her son (10-12yrs old) towards the line of army personnel. The Hindu mob chasing them caught them not more than 20 yards from the army line.

They put burning necklaces of tyres onto the unfortunate pair and burned them alive. The army stood and watched.

Those harrowing scenes will remain with me for the rest of my life.
Rahul

I was seven years old when this event happened, and I can never forget what I went through that day.

I was enjoying a week long holiday with my mum, dad and sister in Kashmir and we had only just arrived the previous day when this incident happened, and then there was chaos everywhere.

We had trouble even getting out of our hotel, let alone going to the airport to catch a plane to go back to Mumbai.

We were listening to the news on the radio and found out that some people were celebrating the death of Indira Gandhi by bursting crackers, distributing sweets and hoisting Pakistan's flag in Kashmir.

Finally we somehow managed to catch a flight back and realised the enormity of the situation when we watched the news on TV.

I can never forget that day. I admired Indiraji for her courage and strength, her death was a great loss to India. May her soul rest in peace.
Shraddha Kane, UK

I was 14 years old and remember the day like it was yesterday.

We were in school and were sent home. Even though we were sikhs, we never supported any claims for Khalistan or Punjab, growing up in the capital since birth - we never thought in religious terms, we were also shocked and saddenned to hear about Mrs Gandhis death. She was a very instrumental politician.

We were home the next morning and went to the roof of our house. The sun could not be seen there was smoke everywhere. The stench of death and fire was in the air.

Suddenly we heard a loud roar and ran back inside.

Iit was a mob being led by a local congress leader with a list of electoral documents in his hand to exactly pinpoint where Sikhs were residing.

We hid in the house and later learnt that this mob had just set fire to various residences in our very posh Delhi neighbourhood and had just burnt down the local Sikh gurudwara.

The mob collected outside our house. I peeked from the second floor window and saw a group of about 50 people standing outside our gates with various weapons, while one person was going through some papers scanning them quickly.

Our relatives that lived on the first floor ran up also to join us and we all huddled in fear.

It seemed like the end was here and it would only be moments before the mob would break through the gates and set upon us.

And then I heard a voice, it was as if GOD had sent an angel to disperse the crowd. It was our next door Hindu neighbour and I remember him in a very firm yet authoratative tone talking to the mob.

He said all the people that live here are our own people.

Then for what seemed like an eternity the mob chanted some slogans and started to move on. We could hardly believe our luck. The will of GOD had saved us and this old neighbour with his commanding presence had talked the crowd to move on with a few simple words.

Those emotional scars have caused me to leave India at the age of 19 And I have not visited or gone back for almost 15 years.

It has turned me into a cynic who will not even visit India because of that one incident.
Bobby Singh, USA

I was four years old. My sister, cousin, brother, mother and me were walking back home in the afternoon from the school bus stop, when we heard someone yelling that Indira Gandhi had been killed.

Once we reached home we all sat around the radio, listening to the story in shock.

My next memories are of my uncle and the other men in our colony forming huge groups and patrolling the neighbourhood throughout the night armed with knifes, sticks etc. to protect the Sikh neighbours in our colony.

All Sikhs were given shelter in neighbours houses. The name plates in front of the houses were removed.

The young Sikh boys were dressed as girls, while others cut their hair.

There was so much tension in the air.
Anusha K Schneider, India

On 31 October 1984 I was due to fly to Calcutta on an SAS flight via Copenhagen from Gatwick. I was travelling with my father.

The weather was terrible in Gatwick and the airport was totally fog bound. My father and I watched as the "CANCELLED" sign flashed up on the departure board for practically every flight.

Our flight was one of the few for which there was no information. Long after the boarding time for the flight had come and gone our names were announced on the tannoy.

My mother, who had come to see us off, was still in the airport and suggested, very calmly, that we leave the departure lounge and forget about boarding.

We did so, thinking her concern must have been weather related. Only in the long car journey back to North Yorkshire, when we switched on the radio, did I realise the wisdom of her advice.

"After the assasination of Indira Gandhi..." came the presenter's voice. Even at my age I knew that spelt bloodshed.

Our flight might have been held in Karachi for hours and several travellers were thrown into the melée when they arrived in India that night.

Instead, I got home and went to bed. The next day was my 11th birthday.
Ms Sarma, UK

I am 32 years old now, I was about 12 years or so at the time.

You know it has been twenty years, twenty years! I cannot imagine. As I remember our first house in India was being built around that time, and we did not have TV in our home, so we watched the death ceremony in our neighour's house.

I remember the mourning of general public on TV and I vividly remember our greatest TV star Amitabh Bachhan crying for Indira Ghandhi.

I don't know how a person can be so attached to the prime minister of his/her country.

We watched the whole ceremony on the TV just like a soap opera. And we enjoyed our off days at school for 13 days. What can a 12 year boy can think of?

And I remember about the riots that happened in our small city. Bareilly, this is a city in north of India in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

Usually Bareilly is a peace loving city, but I remember one incident. One of the friends of my eldest brother was a Sikh, and he had to cut off all his hair so that Hindus did not think him as a Sikh, and did not harm him.

And yeah there was curfew also in our small Mohalla (like a county in US) Subhash Nagar.

And I remember one more thing after the death, my another elder bought a book about Indira, with pictures of her.

I remember two pictures one Indira Ghandhi standing along the border (I don't remember which one Pakistan or China), and one Indira Ghandhi eating roasted corn.
Saharsh Shroteiya, USA

It was a sad demise of Mother Indira who was a role mother and an iron lady of India which is my second home.

Her good works would never go in vain. She was an example in every respect. I love her and shall ever have a respectful position in my heart.

I would like to salute her from the hight of Mount Everest for being Indira. I don't think anybody would be able to take her position.
Khem, Nepal

I still remember vividly the day Mrs Gandhi was killed by her sikh bodyguard; I was Just 11 years old at the time and hardly understood world politics and happennings around the world.

We were crazy about playing cricket those days and we used watch telecast on TV and the state owned Doordarshan in those days.

On that day India playing was test cricket with some country, and suddenly the match was suspended, that's what all I remember.

I have preserved the English newspaper which flashed the news of this shocking and unfortunate incident. I remember the banner headline of a tabloid newspaper, which said: "stop this madness," quoting Mr Rajiv Gandhi.

Indian politics was never the same again. We had a rough and tumultous time afterwards. Hundreds of innocent Sikhs lost their lives and the scars are still fresh for many of them.

Mrs Gandhi was successful in defeating Sikh militancy who demanded a separate Sikh land called Khalistan.

But the repercussions were dangerous and she was eventually assassinated in a very inhuman and dastardly fashion. Henceforward India was never the same again.
Nawal Thorat, India

I was 12 year old at the time and remember how happy we were to get a day off from the school.

My father being a staff of the Ministry of Defence thought that it would be safe enough to do some shopping in evening.

As we were riding on scooter to the market we were stopped by some angels (Hindus of course) telling us not to proceed any further.

My father was confused as to why would any one attack a Sikh and his child particularly when he was in the army.

He did however take their advice and we returned. The next few days were the scariest days of my life.

Thousands of Sikhs were reported killed, innocent girls raped by crowds. Police stood watching... We survived due to our helpful and kind hearted South Indian neighbours but the scars will remain for the rest of my life.
Ranveer Singh, Hong Kong

I have vivid memories of this day working as trainee doctor at Rajendra Prasad Centre which was the Eye Unit of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences where Mrs Gandhi was taken for further treatment.

It was a Wednesday mid-morning when I suddenly noticed the out patient department, which is normally full of people was empty, and when I managed to look out of the clinic, I could see a sea of humanity in the main quadangle in front of private wards.

By then, even before the BBC annouced her death, rumours had gone around and her Sikh body guards were implicated. This set off mini riots in the hospital and President Zail Singh's car was attacked and the Indian President had to be whisked away through the back door.

By evening when I was doing the ward rounds the anti-Sikh riots were in full swing and ordinary Sikh man was chased down the corridors of the hospital by an angry mob in an attempt to attack him.

I did manage to save this man's life by giving him an eye patch asking him to occupy one the empty beds in the hospital and requested him to pretend to be one of the patients. The angry mob eventually left the hospital without succeding to get their victim.

Meanwhile Mrs Gandhi had also donated her eyes for corneal grafting and unfortunately in the political storm the eyes could not retrieved in time. It would have been a great advertisement for eye donation in India and I still think was a missed opportunity.
Dr Raghu Ram, UK

I was out playing with my friends when my grandmother told me that we are going to a friends' place to watch Indira Gandhi's funeral on colour TV. We had a black and white television and I'd never seen a colour TV, so I agreed. That's when I found out she was our prime minister. My mum, then pointed out, "Remember the Operation Bluestar incident?" [the storming of the Sikh Golden Temple at Amritsar by the Indian Army] "Some say she got killed cause of that".

Our family was heading for Jammu and Kashmir then (on day of operation blue star) and our train had a routine stop in Amritsar (in Punjab), but it stayed there longer than expected. We got down and refreshed ourselves with a cup of coffee when my mom came running towards me and said we have to abandon this train and take another one that was arriving shortly and moving away from Punjab.

We boarded the other train in a matter of minutes with many people hanging to the door. Our parents threw us in and my dad got in when the train was still in motion. As we exited the station, we saw men running around with lit torches. That's all I could remember. I later learnt that people were reacting to the Operation Bluestar incident.

My mom described Indira as "a lady who tried to make a difference to the citizens of Mother India". Some of my friends (sikh) friends believed that she was being punished for the Operation Bluestar incident, in which she played an instrumental role.

We still have a picture of Rajiv and Indira Gandhi hanging from our walls to this day. We deck them with flowers, a custom for bestowing respect to the ones that have crossed over (dead).
Prakash Krishnamoorthy, USA

1984: Indian prime minister shot dead

Indira Gandhi, the Prime Minister of India, has been killed by assassins in New Delhi.

Mrs Gandhi was thought to have been walking through her gardens this morning when she was shot. She was taken to the All India Medical Hospital where she underwent an emergency operation to remove the bullets but died an hour and a half later.

Initial reports suggest the two attackers were guards at her home who were then shot by other security officers.

No exact motive is known but it is believed the pair were Sikh extremists acting in retaliation for the storming of the Sikh holy shrine of the Golden Temple in Amritsar in June.

Mrs Gandhi had been receiving death threats since the attack on the temple in which 1,000 people died.

The night before her death she told a political rally: "I don't mind if my life goes in the service of the nation. If I die today, every drop of my blood will invigorate the nation."

Security throughout the country has been stepped up. Roads to the hospital and the home of the prime minister have been sealed off and borders around Delhi have been closed.

If I die today, every drop of my blood will invigorate the nation
Indira Gandhi
The Indian cabinet has started an emergency meeting to choose a successor.

India's High Commissioner, Prakash Mehrotra, said: "Democracy is very deep rooted in our country and the country is prepared to face any situation. A meeting is being called in Delhi, it is usual that the number two man in the cabinet takes charge for the time being,"

Mrs Gandhi first became prime minister in 1966 and again in 1980 and was praised for her battle against famine in rural areas.

Stan Orme from the Anglo Indian Parliamentary Association said: "It is a very terrible thing. She was a very impressive person, very strong-willed. It is a real tragedy."


In Context
Riots erupted across India following the murder of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, as Hindus took their revenge on Sikhs who were blamed for the assassination.

In the days following the death of the prime minister up to 1,000 people are thought to have died. The army were ordered to go into the cities and quell the violence.

Mrs Gandhi's son, Rajiv, was sworn in as her successor within hours of her death. He went on to win a landslide victory in the general election in December 1984.

On 6 January 1989, Satwant Singh and Kehar Singh were hanged for killing Mrs Gandhi. Balbir Singh was acquitted.

Rajiv Gandhi was himself assassinated by a suicide bomber on 21 May 1991.

Report on riots opens old wounds in India - International Herald Tribune

Report on riots opens old wounds in India

NEW DELHI: India's Parliament was disrupted Tuesday as rival lawmakers clashed over a report that named governring Congress Party leaders in connection with anti-Sikh riots in 1984 that left nearly 3,000 Sikhs dead.

Outside Parliament, Sikhs protested against what they called the inquiry commission's whitewash of those accused of orchestrating and participating in the riots.

"We want justice, we want justice," shouted widows and other relatives of the riot victims. Some said that those responsible should be hanged.

Opposition lawmakers want the government to take action against a junior minister, Jagdish Tytler, who the report said may have instigated rioters after Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was killed by her Sikh bodyguards more than 20 years ago.

But the Congress Party-led coalition government headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,himself a Sikh, said it was not taking action against Tytler because the panel did not have conclusive evidence against him. Tytler has denied the charges.

The inquiry - by a retired judge, G.T. Nanavati - was brought before Parliament on Monday. It looked into the deadly religious riots that broke out across northern India after Gandhi was assassinated on Oct. 31, 1984.

Media reports and human rights groups say the Congress Party, which was governing the country at the time as well, was involved in organizing the anti-Sikh killings, a charge the party has denied.

On Tuesday, deputies from the opposition National Democratic Alliance, including members of a small Sikh party, demanded an immediate discussion of the report in the lower house of Parliament; but the speaker said a time had to be agreed upon first for such a debate.

"I deeply mourn the occasion," speaker Somnath Chatterjee said of the riots, as opposition lawmakers shouted anti-government slogans.

He then adjourned the lower house.The upper house was also adjourned for an hour as an uproar erupted over the Nanavati report.

"The Nanavati Commission has held the Congress Party responsible for the killing of Sikhs," Sushma Swaraj of the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party said in the upper house.

The government said it would investigate whether legal action could be taken against another Congress leader, Dharam Das Shastri, also accused of instigating riots.

The uproar in Parliament is an embarrassment for the government, but not a threat to its survival, analysts said.

"For the Congress, it is an important moment," the Indian Express wrote in an editorial. "Its credibility is on test."

Most of the Sikhs killed in the riots in 1984 died in New Delhi, where about 600 cases of arson, killing and rioting were registered. But the police closed half of the cases, with only about 10 rioters convicted of murder.

At least 2,733 people were killed, many of them burnt alive, in reprisal killings after Gandhi's assassination.

The former prime minister's killing was to avenge her decision to send troops to flush out Sikh separatists from the Golden Temple, Sikhism's holiest shrine, in north India.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/08/09/news/india.php

9/11/95 INT/INDIA: PIERCING THE ARMOR

http://www.time.com/time/international/1995/950911/india.html


TIME Magazine

September 11, 1995 Volume 146, No. 11



INDIA

PIERCING THE ARMOR

Punjab's chief minister is assassinated in the latest explosion of the subcontinent's ethnic strife

BY ANTHONY SPAETH

WHEREVER HE WENT, BEANT SINGH traveled in a convoy of vehicles laden with policemen, paramilitary commandos and, taking up the rear, a soldier sitting at a swiveling machine gun mounted on a jeep. Sandwiched protectively in the middle were three armor-plated, white Ambassador sedans with tinted windows and identical license plate numbers. Singh, Chief Minister of India's Punjab state, would ride in one sedan; the others would drive along as decoys in a kind of deadly shell game against Sikh separatists who had vowed to assassinate him.

The terrorists won the lethal contest last week when they detonated a powerful plastic explosive in or near one of the sedans just as Singh was stepping into the car outside his official offices in Chandigarh. The blast killed Singh and 15 others instantly and injured 14 more, shattered windows in the capital complex and was heard 5 km away. The reverberations are likely to travel considerably farther. State officials are evaluating whether Singh's assassination presages a return of the terrorism that plagued verdant Punjab through the 1980s, which Singh had been instrumental in quelling. The attack also inflicted political damage on Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, who has been trumpeting peace and economic resurgence in Punjab as one of his main achievements since taking power in 1991.

Called India's breadbasket for its wheat production, the fertile and productive Punjab was thrown into chaos in 1984 when former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi ordered the army to flush Sikh separatists from Amritsar's Golden Temple complex, the holiest shrine of the Sikh religion. Mrs. Gandhi had an eye on upcoming parliamentary elections and wanted to present a tough image to the electorate throughout India. That she did. But the army action, in which nearly 700 were killed, embittered Punjab's Sikhs, representing more than half the state's population, and gave fierce momentum to groups demanding a separate Sikh nation called Khalistan. Mrs. Gandhi paid the ultimate price, gunned down by her Sikh bodyguards in October 1984. So did many Punjabis: more than 20,000 people died in a decade of violence.

When Rao came to power, he maintained that the solution to the Punjab problem was local legislative elections, which would put an end to five years of often brutal federal rule. Few thought the solution would work: when the elections were held in 1992, all major Sikh groups boycotted them, and voter turnout was 28%. Rao's Congress Party won, and his choice of party stalwart Singh as Chief Minister did not inspire public confidence. But Singh joined forces with a dynamic police chief, K.P.S. Gill, and tracked down rebel terrorists operating within his borders. Fortunately, public support had swung against the Khalistanis, and in a nearly miraculous eight-month period, the militants' strength in almost every Punjabi village was broken and prosperity returned.

Singh's tactics were often ruthless. There were complaints of human-rights abuses: more than 120 court cases, involving more than 450 policemen, are pending against the Punjab police. Corruption and nepotism were rampant, and the Singh administration has had 17 high court indictments against it . In addition, Singh and his superiors in the Congress Party might have been taking their positive press clippings too seriously. Party minions had started calling him "Sher-e-Punjab" or "Lion of Punjab," an appellation formerly reserved for Ranjit Singh, the Sikh warrior king of the early 19th century. At a public meeting last month where Singh presided, the Chief Minister was compared with the Hindu god Rama, as well as revered Sikh gurus. "This doesn't go down well with the people," said journalist and Sikh historian Khushwant Singh.

The separatist Babbar Khalsa group claimed responsibility for Minister Singh's death. Just as swiftly, Indian officials heaped blame on Pakistan, which has provided across-the-border bases for three of the most formidable remaining separatist groups, Babbar Khalsa included, since 1984. There was no disguising that the incident, and its timing, dealt a huge double blow to Rao. In a general election that must be called by April 1996, he faces both intraparty defections and, according to recent state polls, an electorate indifferent to his government. Punjab was one of his seemingly unalloyed successes, and a vital building block: Rao has promised to solve the boiling separatist militancy in Kashmir with exactly the same strategy he used in Punjab.

Terrorism can't make a serious comeback without public support-which is why the circumstances of Singh's death are worrying. He was afforded the highest level of security available in India, a country that knows well the dangers of assassination. Less than a score of VIPs, including the Prime Minister and the President, are so protected. Yet early clues suggest that the bomb was either planted in his car while in the official compound and set off by a remote-control device, or it was delivered by a suicide bomber. Singh's death doesn't prove that the government's strategy in Punjab was faulty, as some analysts have warned. But it demonstrates that the terrorists continue to have supporters, including fanatical ones-even in the most sensitive places.

--Reported by Anita Pratap/New Delhi and Harpreet Singh/ Chandigarh

Copyright 1995 Time Inc. All rights reserved.